Conflicting assessment findings can make a nursing essay difficult to organise. A patient describes worsening discomfort, yet a recorded observation appears unchanged. Your task is to explain how a nurse should interpret that disagreement, rather than choose the finding that best suits your argument. This guide shows how to turn a discrepancy into a focused, evidence-based discussion.

Nursing students comparing study notes for an essay on conflicting assessment findings
Illustrative AI-generated study scene for this nursing essay guide.

Define the conflicting assessment findings

Identify exactly what disagrees: two measurements, a patient account and a score, or observations from different staff. Then establish when each finding arose. A change over several hours may represent a trend rather than a contradiction. Likewise, two tools may measure different aspects of the same problem.

Use a narrow essay question, such as: how should nurses respond when a person’s reported symptoms differ from recorded observations? A useful thesis is that disagreement requires careful verification and person-centred interpretation. It does not justify dismissing either source automatically.

Build an essay plan around the discrepancy

Start with the setting, the assessment purpose and a brief account of the findings. Keep identifying details out of placement examples. Next, explain possible reasons for the mismatch. Compare the evidence behind those explanations before discussing the implications for nursing judgement.

A practical sequence is: define the discrepancy; assess the quality of each source; consider plausible explanations; evaluate the response; identify what remains uncertain. Each section should answer part of the essay question. For broader paragraph support, see our critical nursing essay guide.

Appraise evidence before selecting an explanation

Consider measurement technique, timing, communication needs and the context in which information was collected. Ask whether a reading was repeated or an account clarified. However, do not invent missing observations or assume an instrument failed because its result seems inconvenient.

The NMC Code provides a professional basis for assessment and responding to concerns (NMC, 2018). It cannot establish which explanation is correct in your fictional case. For that question, find research on the relevant population and assessment tool. Evaluate the study setting, sample and limitations before applying its findings.

Work through a critical paragraph

Fictional teaching example: a patient reports greater breathlessness, while a single recorded respiratory observation shows little change. The essay should examine the disagreement without diagnosing its cause.

Example paragraph: The difference between the reported symptom and the recorded observation warrants further consideration. An unchanged reading does not explain the person’s experience. However, the symptom report alone cannot establish a particular diagnosis. Timing, measurement conditions and the wider assessment would help interpret the discrepancy. Therefore, the strongest argument supports a timely review of the concern while acknowledging the limits of the available information.

Add relevant clinical research beside the claims it supports. This paragraph illustrates reasoning, so adapt its structure to your own question rather than submit it as assessed work.

Discuss conflicting assessment findings without overclaiming

Distinguish a possible explanation from a supported conclusion. Write that a difference ‘may reflect’ timing when timing data are incomplete. Use firmer language only where evidence warrants it. Our guide to explaining uncertainty in nursing essays shows how to qualify a claim clearly.

Also consider the patient’s perspective. Treating a score as more credible simply because it is numerical can weaken an essay. Conversely, calling every discrepancy an error overlooks normal variation and the limits of different tools. Evaluate both positions and explain why your conclusion fits the case.

Avoid common writing mistakes

Do not turn the discussion into a list of observations. Explain why each finding matters to the argument. Avoid assuming that a reassuring score excludes every concern, or that conflicting accounts prove negligence. For a related but narrower issue, read about clinical judgement when an early warning score is low.

Make the conclusion proportional to the evidence. It can recommend a reasoned approach to interpretation without claiming the essay has resolved an uncertain clinical situation. Cite sources for professional and clinical claims, and distinguish these from your own analysis.

Revision questions for conflicting assessment findings

Can a reader identify the discrepancy in one sentence? Have you separated timing differences from genuinely inconsistent findings? Does every proposed explanation have evidence or an explicit statement of uncertainty?

Finally, check that your response follows from the analysis. A paragraph about unreliable measurement should explain what that means for interpretation. If your draft needs language and structure feedback, our nursing essay proofreading service supports revision of your own writing.

Frequently asked questions

Should I choose the most objective finding? Consider the quality and purpose of every source. A numerical result is not automatically the most relevant evidence.

Can I discuss more than one explanation? Yes. Compare plausible explanations, then explain which the available evidence supports most strongly.

Is this a clinical decision guide? No. It is an academic writing guide. Real assessment decisions require current guidance, local procedures and appropriate clinical supervision.

References

Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) (2018) The Code: Professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses, midwives and nursing associates. Read the Code (Accessed: 19 October 2026).